World AIDS Day: South Africa to Treat all HIV Children

Jacob Zuma, President of South Africa, announced that the country will attempt to supply treatment for all HIV-positive children. South Africa carries the highest rate of HIV-positive people of all countries in the world with more than one in ten citizens currently diagnosed with HIV. According to researchers HIV usually affects those in their childbearing ages, and more than 2.4 million children have been left stranded by HIV so far. According to Ivor Chipkin, chief research specialist at the Human Sciences Research Council in Tshwane, 32 percent of all young South Africans will have lost at least one of their parents to HIV by year 2015.

Many people blame the policies of the former South Africa President, Thabo Mbeki, for the widespread AIDS epidemic in the country. Mbeki often disputed the link between HIV and AIDS and was against the widespread distribution of antiretroviral medications. Instead he encouraged HIV-positive people to eat garlic and beet roots, and to drink lemon juice to deter HIV. People believe that Mbeki’s attitudes and actions could have contributed to as many as 330,000 early deaths.

President Zuma, who was the Vice President to Mbeki, is trying to lengthen the gap between his and his predecessor’s policies. South Africa offers anti-retroviral (ARV) treatments to 700,000 HIV patients, over double the 216,000 patients from last year. At roughly $1,500 a year for each treatment it can get a bit pricey. Fortunately, foreign donors have often provided treatments free of charge, and the US ambassador to South Africa has announced that the United States will contribute another $120 million for next year’s AIDS treatment and research.

* For the complete article, please visit https://aboutmyhealth.us/original-articles/

Can I get Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 in the genital region if I already have cold sores?

Question:
Hi,

I just met a person who I really like.

He also just told me he has Herpes Simplex type 1, but in the genital area.

I have had cold sores all my life with sporadic outbreaks and thus I suspect that I have Herpes Simplex type 1, in the oral area. Usually, the outbreaks occur when I don’t sleep or when I get allergies. I will go and test myself soon to confirm or check this. Where do I do this?

My first main question is the following. What is the risk of him infecting me with the genital form if we were to have unprotected sex? After reading lots on the web it seems that you are at a lower risk of getting one type of Herpes Simplex if you already have the other since it normally keeps to the area where you get outbreaks. Is this true for my situation? What about the reverse (me infecting him with the oral one)?

The second question is what is the risk of him infecting me if we use protection? I have read about the asymptomatic spread, viral shedding. Can Herpes Simplex type 1 spread from areas where it is not usually broken out? In effect: can it go from him in the area not covered by the condom if he usually has outbreaks in a part that covers the area infected (although of course not during outbreak).

Thank you so much for helping me.

Answer:
To answer your first question, there are many different ways to go about testing. Many places offer laboratory based testing, which is the highest quality testing available. Usually, there is no long wait, as there would be in a clinic, to get tested, as well as to receive your results. On top of this, they don’t send you to a clinic. Rather, they would send you to a private, and thus discreet, patient service center. Check out the links in the sidebar (right side) if this is what you are looking for.

The general principle about herpes is that there are two types, HSV1 and HSV2. HSV1 usually appears orally, while HSV2 usually appears genitally, but in about 30% of cases, HSV1 appears genitally and HSV2 appears orally.

The first thing that you should do would be to get tested. It would be in your best interest for you and you partner to be tested for both HSV1 and HSV2. I am not sure how your partner determined that he has HSV1 genitally, but the most accurate way would be to run a culture test on a swab of the blister or outbreak. In the absence of outbreaks, you could get tested for both HSV1 and HSV2, using a separate IgG test for both, at least three months after possible exposure. If only HSV1 shows up positive and the only outbreaks that have been observed are in the genital region, then it can be safely assumed that the genital outbreaks are caused by HSV1. This aside, you should make sure that what you have been observing orally, is actually herpes, or specifically HSV1. Many people have canker sores, and they think that this is herpes. It is actually an aphthous ulcer, is not contagious, and is similar to herpes in terms of symptoms.

Now, let’s move on to your second and third questions.

If you and your partner have HSV1, then you can’t get it from him, and he can’t get it from you, because both of you already have standing antibodies towards HSV1. In your specific scenario, you should be protected from getting HSV1 in the genital region, if you already have it orally. Once you know you have HSV1, then you really not subject to getting it again, no matter the location. On the other hand, if you don’t have HSV1, and what you have been noticing is not actually herpes, then you could get it from your partner. You could get it genitally, from sexual intercourse; you could get it orally, from performing oral sex on him. In reality, if you don’t have HSV1, you could receive it orally and genitally, if you are infected at the same time. For example, if you perform oral sex on him and then have intercourse with him, you would likely receive the virus in both areas, because you haven’t built up that immune response to protect you from getting re-infected.

If you have HSV2, then you aren’t necessarily immune to receiving HSV1, but this would provide some resistance against infection. How much resistance? That isn’t exactly established, but we do know that having one type of herpes (thus having those antibodies) lends some resistance against the other type of herpes.

How Risky is a Hand Job?

What are the chances that a male can catch HIV from a female who gave him a manual release (hand job)?
None. Well, OK, if we conjure up the worst case scenario and employ a vivid imagination, maybe the chances are close to none instead of actually none. Let’s say, for argument sake, that the male has serious STD problems resulting in open sores on the penis or in the urethra (for example, he may have a very active genital herpes infection). Let’s also say, again, for argument sake, that the woman is HIV positive, has a high viral count and is in the middle of her monthly menstrual cycle. She then uses the blood to lubricate the man during the hand job, forcing the blood into the penile lesions. Another possibility would be if the HIV positive woman had just acquired a wound on her hand, and thus the wound would be bleeding while she performed on the male. Even then it wouldn’t be easy, most likely because if her hand was bleeding, she probably wouldn’t be performing a hand job on the male. None or next to none. You be the judge.

A New Wave of HIV Anti-retroviral Therapy?

Scientists from across the world have done research on what appears to be a promising addition to the different forms of HIV Anti-retroviral therapy.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus, or HIV, is the virus that causes AIDS, and is at the forefront of research in many fields.  One of the most interesting topics of research is anti-retroviral therapy (ART) implemented in HIV positive patients in order to reduce the effect of the virus.

The newest breakthrough entails using snake and insect venom as a form of ART. A major component in bee venom inhibits replication of both CXCR4 and CCR5 HIV-1 in human CD4 cells. Phospholipase A2 (PLA2), which is found in the venom of many snakes, has been shown to block viral entry into cells.

The exact mechanism, whether enzymatic or simply competing for a binding site, is still in the process of being worked out.  Aside from this, the most important details have shown promising signs for the field of research dedicated to HIV treatment.

This discussion further reiterates the needs and necessity for regular, comprehensive STD testing.  If everybody got tested for STDs on a regular basis, the incidence of HIV (among other STDs) would be considerably lower.  Testing is simple, and should be done (as according to the CDC) every six months to one year, or in between sexual partners.

For the complete article, please refer to the original articles page.

Teacher sentenced for not revealing HIV

A former teacher from South Carolina has been charged with three counts first-degree criminal sexual conduct.  The judge also ordered the teacher, Joel L. Bedenbaugh, to register as a sex offender.

Bedenbaugh was sentenced to six years in prison for not telling his ex-wife, to whom he was married for five years, that he had HIV.  This exposed her to possible infection.  Instead, he told her that the medicine that he took was for a blood disease.  She remains uninfected.

It is illegal to knowingly engage in sexual intercourse with another person without first informing them of an HIV infection.

In 2006, Bedenbaugh was convicted for  inappropriate contact with a 13-year-old girl in November 2006.  More recently, in 2008, he was investigated for  an alleged sexual assault on a juvenile in 2008.  This brought about attention to his medical history, which indicated that he had HIV.

For the original article, please refer to original articles.

Will Reducing Pap Tests Cause an Increase in STDs?

In the past, women have been told to get annual Pap tests starting three years after becoming sexually active or when they turn 21 – whichever came first. Now teen girls are able to skip Pap tests, according to new guidelines, and they should start receiving the tests when they turn 21. Experts are now concerned that with one in four teen girls contracting an STD, often soon after becoming active, rates may begin to rise.

Kimberly Spector, an adolescent-health educator in Los Angeles, is concerned that young girls will lose the opportunities to ask questions about their sexual health if they aren’t routinely coming in for a Pap test. She says that even if no tests are performed, a simple conversation with the doctor can be very informative.

While the new guidelines suggest that girls under 21 visit their gynecologist,  many people are worried that if women hear that they don’t need to have a Pap test annually, they won’t make the effort to get any preventive care against STDs such as chlamydia, gonorrhea, genital herpes, and human papillomavirus (HPV).

Harold Wiesenfeld, M.D., director of the division of reproductive infectious diseases at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, acknowledges that many STDs do not show symptoms. If someone is positive for an STD and it is left untreated, often the STD will develop into more serious complications including pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility.

Many experts have agreed that Pap tests are unnecessary for teenage girls, and that waiting until they’re 21 years old will not put them at risk. Bobbie Gostout, M.D., chair of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota says that the guidelines are well thought out, and that she is not afraid of any consequences.

Ideally teens should receive the appropriate vaccines and develop a relationship with their doctor before becoming sexually active, but if they do not it is not a bad idea to receive a Pap test annually for the sake of their own health.

*For the complete article, please visit https://aboutmyhealth.us/original-articles/

Risks: 5 Pathogens Linked to Risk for Stroke

A new study shows an association between five common pathogens and an increased risk for stroke.
Many strokes cannot be explained by known risk factors like high blood pressure and smoking.
The infections in order of significance are Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2, according to the study, published online on Nov. 9 in The Archives of Neurology. Each of these infection persist after the acute stage, and perpetuate a state of chronic low-level infection, which can lead to inflammation in the vessel walls. This could be the reason leading to the disease.
This study did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship between common infections and stroke, only an association, and that the evidence was circumstantial.
For the article in its entirety, please refer to original articles.

Eyebrow Waxing Can Spread Herpes

Eyebrow waxing is a very popular procedure, and many women consider it to be critical to their beauty needs.

This seemingly necessary beauty treatment can also have negative consequences.

The poor sanitary practices in many spas, such as re-dipping the wax stick, can spread different diseases, such as eye herpes. There is a direct link between an increase of eye herpes and eyebrow waxing.

The herpes virus could easily be transmitted from one person with herpes, getting their lips waxed, to the next person, who doesn’t have herpes, who may be getting some waxing done.

There are simple sanitary procedures that should be followed to prevent the spread of herpes.

Technicians should wash their hands. Every time a wax stick is placed on a clients skin, it should be thrown away directly after use. Also, if the was treatment requires the client to lie down, the table should be covered prior to use.

There are approximately 500,000 cases of ocular herpes each year in the U.S. This cannot be cured, and thus can lead to blindness.

Symptoms of ocular herpes include tearing, redness, blurry vision, eye discomfort and sometimes a thick, sticky mucous secretion.

CDC Encourages Yearly STD Testing More Than Ever

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is encouraging people to have yearly STD testing now more than ever. With record-setting rates of chlamydia infections in 2007 (over 1 million), the CDC supplied this simple statement: “get tested”. Following this statement they offered recommendations for individual STDs.

According to the CDC, everyone ages 13 to 64 should do an HIV test at least once. People who have had more than one partner since their last STD test, and people who’s partner has had more than one partner should get tested regularly. Also at higher risk are men who have sex with men (MSM) and people who already have an STD. These people should also get tested at least once a year.

Women should get an annual Pap test beginning when they are 21-years of age, or earlier if they are sexually active. The Pap test is a screening tool used by doctors to detect cancerous changes of the cervix, which is a common result of the common human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV usually does not show any symptoms; however, it can lead to genital warts in both men and women. Unfortunately there is no screening test for HPV in men. Men who think they have symptoms of HPV should see someone about a physical exam.

In addition to HPV, the CDC suggests that sexually active women under 25 should get tested for chlamydia and gonorrhea at least once a year. Regular screening is also recommended for men who have sex with men, older women who have had multiple partners, and pregnant women.

Syphilis rates reached a record low in year 2000; however, they have been increasing since causing the CDC to suggest syphilis screening for individuals who feel they are at risk.

*For the complete article, please visit https://aboutmyhealth.us/original-articles/

Clarksville police make HIV arrest

First time in local police history for charge under 1994 state law

A Clarksville woman was arrested Thursday.  She was charged with knowingly exposing a man to HIV.

The woman, Donyel Da’Shawn Brown, was charged with criminal exposure to HIV, and her bond was set at $1 million.

The arrest warrant states a man reported Brown knowingly had unprotected sex with him for four years without telling him she was infected.

Also, Brown and the man had a child during the time she was diagnosed with HIV, the warrant said, but has not been determined if the child has HIV. Whether the child and man were infected has not been determined, Knoll said.

The state law, which took effect in 1994, does not require “the actual transmission of HIV” for someone to be convicted. Brown can be acquitted if she can prove that her partner had prior knowledge of her HIV status.

If convicted, Brown could face jail time of three to six years.

For the complete article, please refer to www.aboutmyhealth.us/original-articles/

Categories