Tiger Woods’ Alleged Mistress to get Tested?

Rachel Uchitel, Tiger Woods’ mistress, has reportedly planned to do some testing for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Uchitel apparently told her friends that she planned on testing after multiple women, including a few porn actresses, claimed they had also had relations with Woods.

Uchitel’s decision to get tested is a smart one indeed. By having sex with Tiger, who supposedly has had unprotected sex with many different women throughout his marriage, Uchitel potentially exposed herself to several possible infections.

Several of Woods’ extramarital affairs have been exposed following his car crash last week, however no comments have been made as to whether his wife, model Elin Nordegren, will have any STD testing done.

All in all, it is probably a good idea for all of Tiger’s partners to get tested at some point following these allegations. Affairs are obviously something that people would rather keep private, but if you are at higher risk like these women for contracting an STD it is better to be safe than sorry.

*For the complete article, please visit http://stdtest.com/original-articles/

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Condom Broke, MSM, Top Partner HIV Risk

Question:

I had Anal Sex with an HIV positive person twice. The first time, the condom didn’t break, but the second time the condom broke for 3-4 second. I can say the exact time and I took my penis out. After that, I put on a new condom and continued. This time the condom didn’t break. Only the head of my penis touched the inside of his anus. Does this type of exposure put me at risk for HIV? Please help. I am scared. My life is very disturbed.

1st) One AIDS center told me that my negative DNA PCR is accurate after 8 days and also after 28 days. Are they correct or incorrect? If this test can detect virus, then how reliable is it after 28 days? What is rate of false negative results on the DNA PCR?

2nd) How reliable is the 12 week (3 month) window period? Some sites recommend 6 months or even up to one year. Does this refer to the DNA PCR or another test? My 28 days negative DNA PCR is very encouraging to me but I’m worried that some of the sites say to wait 6 months or 1 year.

3rd) After my condom broke, we only had sex for about 3-4 more seconds before I put on a new condom. Am I safe or not? I am circumcised and I have no cuts my penis or any other STDs. I’m just worried because my penis touched the inside of an HIV positive person. Also please answer this: what is the risk of a top partner acquiring HIV from an HIV positive bottom partner?

4th) Lastly, do you think I need to do further testing if I have come back negative on a 28 day HIV DNA PCR and a 12 week ELISA test?

Sorry for all the questions, but I am very worried and my life has been very disturbed lately. Thanks for your help.

Answer:

You mentioned that the condom broke during one of your contacts with this person. This does put you at risk for HIV, although you did mention that you were the top partner, so this lowers your risk slightly, assuming that you didn’t have any type of genital ulcer disease (like herpes or syphilis), legions, or breaks in the skin of your penis.
What are more important are your consistently negative test results. An HIV DNA PCR test doesn’t really tell you much at eight days after exposure, although the results are considered conclusive at 28 days after exposure, per manufacturer’s standards. In most cases the reliability of this test at 28+ days is upwards of 99.99%, making the rate of false results <0.01%. They say that the window period for the PCR test is 28 days.
The window period for an ELISA/EIA test, on the other hand, is three months, so about 99.9% of the population will show up positive at 3 months, if they are, in fact, positive for HIV. In other words, a negative result on the HIV ELISA test is about 99.9% reliable. The 6 month recommendation is an outdated number.
The risk of acquiring HIV, even from a positive partner through unprotected sex is fairly low, if you are the top partner, or inserting partner. This is assuming that you are a healthy individual, with no breaks in your primary boundary to the outside world, your skin. This is due to the fact that HIV must bind to CD4+ T-cells, which are only present at the surface of the skin when there is a legion or break in the skin, because your body recruits immune cells to try to fight off any incoming bacteria or viruses while it is also healing the area. HIV is also a non-motile virus, so it cannot propel itself up your urethra, and get into your body that way, so your penis, when healthy, provide a great barrier against HIV.

I hope this helps,
SMK

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Specificity of HIV testing

Q: My Grandma, a rheumatoid arthritis patient, had a blood transfusion for a surgery 4 months ago. Two weeks ago, her HIV ELISA test was found to be positive. We then performed an HIV PCR test that was found to be negative. I would like to know the specificity of the test and whether an additional western blot test is necessary?

A: The decision to retest for HIV can be influenced by a couple different factors. First, we would like to emphasize that the risk of contracting HIV through a blood transfusion has been greatly reduced since the implementation of blood screening technology. According to the Red Cross, the chances of becoming infected through a blood transfusion is approximately 1 in 1.5 million units of blood.
Secondly, has a Western Blot already been performed? If so, when was it done and what was the result?
You also mentioned an HIV PCR test, and it is a great sign that the test came back negative. Do you know which PCR your grandmother had (HIV DNA PCR or HIV RNA PCR)?
If you can provide this information we may be able to offer some guidance in this difficult situation. Please feel free to email a response, and please include this post’s title in the subject line.

Is the HIV DNA PCR test reliable?

I had a recent exposure on Jan 6th and I heard the DNA PCR will be able to provide conclusive results on HIV after 28 days.

However, I read contradictory statements on the internet that it is not a reliable method and there are more false positives and even HIV positive people are not caught with this test. Is that so? Please let me know how accurate it will be right after 28 days from the day of exposure.

Answer:

It is true there are many misconceptions regarding this test and other tests for HIV that are different from the traditional HIV antibody test.

Let’s say for the last 20 years, the most common way to save your life during a car accident, and the only device that consumers were familiar with was called a seat belt. More recently developed is a more advanced technology known as an airbag. As you can imagine, it took sometime for this new technology to be accepted and understood, as it has for the DNA PCR. Admittedly, there are many misconceptions about this test, as well as other HIV tests, as well as the subject of HIV and AIDS as a whole, for that matter.

You asked if the HIV DNA PCR has a higher rate of false positives. The misconception regarding false positives stems from the DNA PCR not being offered with an automatic reflex to a confirmatory test. If it was detected, another test had to be performed to confirm the presence of HIV. The same argument could be made about the HIV ELISA, if only the ELISA did not automatically reflex to a confirmatory test called the Western Blot.

The PCR (polymerase chain reaction) is a noble prize winning technology, and it is the best option available when someone is concerned about recent HIV exposure. It is used for health care workers after a needle stick. Originally it was developed to test infants born to HIV positive mothers, because a positive antibody test, in this case, was not a reliable marker of infection.

You also said that you heard that even people that are HIV positive are not caught on this test. There is not much to say about that other than it is simply not true. I am not sure where or why that would be said. The DNA PCR is the absolute most sensitive test for HIV. In terms of measurement capacity, it can detect as little as 10 copies of proviral DNA per milliliter of whole blood. Even the most sensitive HIV RNA PCR test can only detect 40-50 copies per ml.

We are sorry to hear you are having trouble finding what you need. If you have decided to get tested, click here. If you have any more questions, please let us know.

Marriage License Requirements

Question: I just recently got engaged, and I’ve been hearing that STD testing is required to get a marriage license. Is this true?

– Mississippi

Answer:

In many states, this can be the case. Mississippi in particular requires that both parties provide proof from within the past 30 days that they are free of syphilis. If you are getting married outside of your home state, the laws will most like differ for a marriage license. Some states require STD testing, and others may require nothing at all. Presently, no states require an pre-marital HIV/AIDS test; however, many states will require that applicants at least be offered the opportunity to have an HIV test.

Either way, HIV and STD testing is is simple to do. Low cost testing can usually be arranged through your health department, but the process is not very private and tends to take a while. Fast and private testing can generally be found through private laboratories or through a search online, but there is usually a cost associated with it.

Before tying the knot, make sure you have followed all of the guidelines set forth by your state – including HIV and STD testing. Even if testing is not included in the marriage license requirements, it is not a bad idea to to checked for the sole purpose of your health.

Are You in Love?

Question: Hi, I think I’ve found the love of my life and I want to do everything I can to make this a good healthy relationship. What should I do?

Answer:  If you are in love, it’s safe to assume that you also care about this person’s health. Before taking the next step in your relationship, or even starting a sexual relationship, you should take the precautionary steps to protect you and your partner’s sexual health.

HIV and STD testing is an easy and responsible way to start a relationship. Free testing can often be found through government sponsored agencies, such as a health department, but in a lot of cases the process takes a long time and is not as private as people would prefer. Fast and private lab testing can be found, but it does involve a cost. Cost of the testing and the service you receive will vary greatly depending on which company you choose, so be sure to shop around before you choose an organization.

Regardless of which method you choose, STD testing is important for both you and your loved one’s health. If you are in love and you care about the person, an easy way to show it is by getting tested so you can protect eachother’s health.

Is HIV/STD testing needed for a foreign work visa?

In many cases, yes. More and more countries are requiring that travelers and tourists have proof of HIV/STD testing before attaining a work visa. Russia, for example, requires proof of HIV testing if one is staying for 90 or more days – which is often the case if they are travelling for work. Canada, China, India, and South Africa are also among the list of countries who include HIV testing in their visa requirements.

In some countries, a test is only required upon certain circumstances, such as the case with Russia. In other places it may depend on the visitor’s age, the purpose of their visit, or in many cases the length of their stay. Failure to adhere to these policies could result in work visa denial or other complications. It is recommended that travellers investigate the guidelines set by their destination before making any travel arrangements.

Categories